Loadcoach42

Complexity Of Text Complexity Of Thoughtthoughtfull English Language Arts

1. Schicchi D, Pilato G (2018) WORDY: a semi-automatic methodology aimed at the creation of neologisms based on a semantic network and blending devices. In: Barolli L, Terzo O (eds) Complex, intelligent, and software intensive systems. Springer, Cham, pp 236–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Schicchi D, Pilato G (2018) A social humanoid robot as a playfellow for vocabulary enhancement. In: 2018 second IEEE international conference on robotic computing (IRC). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp 205–208Google Scholar
3. Di Gangi MA, Federico M (2018) Deep neural machine translation with weakly-recurrent units. In: 21st annual conference of the European association for machine translation, pp 119–128Google Scholar
4. Alfano M, Lenzitti B, Lo Bosco G, Perticone V (2015) An automatic system for helping health consumers to understand medical texts, pp 622–627Google Scholar
5. Kincaid J (1975) Derivation of new readability formulas: (automated readability index, fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Research branch report. Chief of naval technical training, Naval Air Station MemphisGoogle Scholar
6. Dell’Orletta F, Montemagni S, Venturi G (2011) Read-it: assessing readability of Italian texts with a view to text simplification. In: Proceedings of the second workshop on speech and language processing for assistive technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 73–83Google Scholar
7. Xu W, Napoles C, Pavlick E, Chen Q, Callison-Burch C (2016) Optimizing statistical machine translation for text simplification. Trans Assoc Comput Linguist 4:401–415. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Lo Bosco G, Pilato G, Schicchi D (2018) A recurrent deep neural network model to measure sentence complexity for the Italian language. In: Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on artificial intelligence and cognitionGoogle Scholar
9. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297zbMATHGoogle Scholar
10. Schmid H (2013) Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In: New methods in language processing, p 154Google Scholar
11. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
13. Xu W, Callison-Burch C, Napoles C (2015) Problems in current text simplification research: new data can help. Trans Assoc Comput Linguist 3:283–297. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Lo Bosco G, Pilato G, Schicchi D (2018) A sentence based system for measuring syntax complexity using a recurrent deep neural network. In: 2nd workshop on natural language for artificial intelligence, NL4AI 2018, vol 2244. CEUR-WS, pp 95–101Google Scholar
15. Bosco GL, Pilato G, Schicchi D (2018) A neural network model for the evaluation of text complexity in Italian language: a representation point of view. Procedia Comput Sci 145:464–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Complexity Of Text Complexity Of Thoughtthoughtfull English Language

The English language is composed of 40 phonemes, which combine to form around 100,000 different morphemes, which then combine to form over 1,000,000 different words and derivations (Meyers 384). In order to handle all of these words in a structured and organized manner, we develop rules and patterns to create a standard method to communicate. The Standards provide grade-specific text complexity requirements. These complexity requirements are spelled out in Figure 4 on page 10 of Appendix A. Essentially, text complexity is defined in grades or grade bands. By the end of the year, students should read and understand proficiently texts that fall within these ranges.